DuckRabbit
Well-Known Member
Have any of you had experiences of telling the truth in some situation, or disclosing something, only to be excoriated or shunned by others who resent that that truth was disclosed?
When confronted with a truth or a criticism, many react defensively. They may attack the ‘whistleblower’, calling the whistleblower’s integrity, intelligence or sanity into question, rather than reflecting on the reality, behaviour or quality that the whistleblower has highlighted. E.g., the case of oil industry whistleblower Hamel
Oil industry whistleblower Hamel, subject of industry spy campaign, dead at 84
Many people choose not to expose the discrepant attitude or wrongdoing that they have witnessed for fear of losing their job or being excommunicated. They choose to protect their social standing, their livelihood or the company's reputation instead. They are able to compartmentalise the moral conflict and de-emphasise it in comparison to their own interests.
NTs by definition have no social deficits; they can be said to have more social-political aptitude. NTs therefore are more likely to realise in advance the implications of whistleblowing, and decide with more insight whether to blow the whistle or not. Due to their greater social embeddness, NTs may be more aware of the possibility of reprisals.
I'm wondering whether Asperger hardwiring doesn't predispose one to be a whistleblower more readily than NTs?
When confronted with a truth or a criticism, many react defensively. They may attack the ‘whistleblower’, calling the whistleblower’s integrity, intelligence or sanity into question, rather than reflecting on the reality, behaviour or quality that the whistleblower has highlighted. E.g., the case of oil industry whistleblower Hamel
Oil industry whistleblower Hamel, subject of industry spy campaign, dead at 84
Many people choose not to expose the discrepant attitude or wrongdoing that they have witnessed for fear of losing their job or being excommunicated. They choose to protect their social standing, their livelihood or the company's reputation instead. They are able to compartmentalise the moral conflict and de-emphasise it in comparison to their own interests.
NTs by definition have no social deficits; they can be said to have more social-political aptitude. NTs therefore are more likely to realise in advance the implications of whistleblowing, and decide with more insight whether to blow the whistle or not. Due to their greater social embeddness, NTs may be more aware of the possibility of reprisals.
I'm wondering whether Asperger hardwiring doesn't predispose one to be a whistleblower more readily than NTs?
Last edited: