Aristotle is hard to understand, but it's not that his ideas are hard to understand; it's his style of writing, in which everything is super compacted, and seriously needs more elaboration. Aquinas, on the other hand, has the most explanatory and clear writing style imaginable.
-
Feeling isolated? You're not alone.
Join 20,000+ people who understand exactly how your day went. Whether you're newly diagnosed, self-identified, or supporting someone you love – this is a space where you don't have to explain yourself.
Join the Conversation → It's free, anonymous, and supportive.
As a member, you'll get:
- A community that actually gets it – no judgment, no explanations needed
- Private forums for sensitive topics (hidden from search engines)
- Real-time chat with others who share your experiences
- Your own blog to document your journey
You've found your people. Create your free account
Philosopher Contrast: Aristotle and Aquinas
- Author Ste11aeres
- Create date
- Blog entry read time 1 min read
Blog entry information
More entries in General
-
Inner Smile meditationThe past few days have been days of inner turmoil, including a fairly intense depression spike... -
Not deserving things - complicated feelingsI feel like i don't deserve some of the things i have. But i believe in God and believe this...
More entries from Ste11aeres
-
This feelingThis feeling that grips my heart Like a tight vice As I see the hatred that has overtaken my... -
TodayToday I let my dog meet a tiny daschund up close. It was a teeny tiny dog that lives in our...
-
Dog caused deaths-the size factor and the size-related sweet spotThe most dangerous dogs are the largest. I did not say "most aggressive", but most dangerous...
-
Dog Kills Man-not enough details knownThis is the second installment in my series of blog articles examining specific instances of...
-
GilsonBrief Explanation: Etienne Gilson was an early and mid 20th century philosopher who specialized...