I commented on a video on YouTube that Rampage for GBC had some really bad and ugly graphics and people got mad and called me “ignorant” and claimed I was “trolling” and that they are amazing and the video isn’t what they really look like and that I’ve never saw the game in person. I actually have and I mainly remember it because I went on this church youth group retreat in high school and these boys tried to frame me for stealing a GBC with this stupid game with no proof and never got in trouble for it even after I proved to everyone that I didn’t do it. But that isn’t why I said these games were awful. I said because they truly are when you examine them and compare them to other games released around the same time which is between 1999 and 2000.
I mean does this look good to you?
Now for some games released around the same time and older:
Seriously, am I the only one to think that the game looks awful by GBC and above standards when we had other games on the system hat looked much better? And I don’t think it was “limitations of the system” or because it wasn’t made by Nintendo either as the Batman was created by Ubisoft which is a third party developer. Please explain to me why I’m “ignorant.”
I mean does this look good to you?
Now for some games released around the same time and older:
Seriously, am I the only one to think that the game looks awful by GBC and above standards when we had other games on the system hat looked much better? And I don’t think it was “limitations of the system” or because it wasn’t made by Nintendo either as the Batman was created by Ubisoft which is a third party developer. Please explain to me why I’m “ignorant.”