Quality

[Ronald Zeeman]

Noticed, now looking back we as a group, make very good quality professionals, easy to get certification various levels I took it to management of quality level the highest level to no avail. I would strongly recommend this for others here seeking employment. pays well. Depending on certification level.

 

[Ronald Zeeman]

Video that told me they need us

 

[Dagan]

I can't give you details, but I'm in this field for 22 years - the day job that pays the bills / insurance (entertainment jobs are contract gigs for extra money). The company I work for rarely has marginal issues like Boeing keeps having. Every one of these instances causes audits and revisions (if needed), but every time, it comes down to "we're fine...it was just those folks not doing what they're supposed to."

The Air India accident isn't fully disclosed, either. I'm privy to whispers about it, and yeah, they "could" be bunk, but I don't think so. I'm thinking they're true, and I doubt that information is coming out soon.

 

[Neonatal RRT]

In addition to quality professionals, the skilled trades are often tailored to the autistic mind that is highly focused and has an attention to detail. There are companies and government programs that will actually pay you to obtain these degrees...if you commit to a few years employment.

Tradespeople wanted: The need for critical trade skills in the US

 

[Judge]

The irony, in where concepts like "planned obsolescence" to create "return customers" doesn't bode well in industries which must legally bear the responsibilities and costs of "strict liability".

That such industries (aircraft product and airline service to the public) cannot afford to cut costs over quality control and budget restrictions. Otherwise it can potentially be catastrophic to a business that isn't sufficiently capitalized to be able to incur such losses and yet remain a player in the market.

"Strict liability is a legal principle that holds a party responsible for damages or injuries caused by their actions or products, regardless of whether they acted negligently or intended to cause harm. This concept is often applied in cases involving defective products or inherently dangerous activities."

The scary part to me is where behind closed doors corporate directors and officers make such decisions where they are aware of the risks and proceed with them anyways to protect shareholder equity and retain the appearance of a healthy balance sheet on paper. Sometimes at the risk of public lives which such mindsets are clearly willing to gamble over. Particularly when in their minds they have that valuable capitalization to offset such losses.

 

[Mary Terry]

I can't give you details, but I'm in this field for 22 years - the day job that pays the bills / insurance (entertainment jobs are contract gigs for extra money). The company I work for rarely has marginal issues like Boeing keeps having. Every one of these instances causes audits and revisions (if needed), but every time, it comes down to "we're fine...it was just those folks not doing what they're supposed to."

The Air India accident isn't fully disclosed, either. I'm privy to whispers about it, and yeah, they "could" be bunk,. but I don't think so. I'm thinking they're true, and I doubt that information is coming out soon.

I'm kind of keeping up with the stories about the Air India disaster. It appears one of the pilots killed the wrong engine on takeoff, either negligently or intentionally.

 

[Judge]

I'm kind of keeping up with the stories about the Air India disaster. It appears one of the pilots killed the wrong engine on takeoff, either negligently or intentionally.

Those red cutoff buttons at the bottom of the console? Yeah, that was my uptake as well.

-Human error at best. Deliberate mass murder/suicide at worst.

 

[Ronald Zeeman]

This purpose of this thread is to push the point jobs that fit our unique abilities are available plus essential.

 

[Judge]

This purpose of this thread is to push the point jobs that fit our unique abilities are available plus essential.

But the real question is whether corporate employers agree, disagree or are entirely ambivalent about it. That's a scary thing to consider when such entities focus primarily on shareholders' equity and quarterly advances. When behind closed doors, quality is not their number one objective.

 

[Ronald Zeeman]

I worked at a Ford assembly plant producing pick up trucks employed by one of their suppliers Now Henkel, I was able to single handedly change this plant, which in turn changed the industry reverse onus became a thing. Fords thing at the time was Q1, I took it seriously, when I I left this position I became a quality engineer. As Boeing is seeing quality matters. Us Aspies have what is needed, our quirks are our strengths ideally suited to this. Check out American society for quality. Your future could be here.

 

[Judge]

I worked at a Ford assembly plant producing pick up trucks employed by one of their suppliers Now Henkel, I was able to single handedly change this plant, which in turn changed the industry reverse onus became a thing. Fords thing at the time was Q1, I took it seriously, when I I left this position I became a quality engineer. As Boeing is seeing quality matters. Us Aspies have what is needed, our quirks are our strengths ideally suited to this. Check out American society for quality. Your future could be here.

Sounds like they need you back....

Ford Says Its Quality Is Improving; Why Is This Number Going in the Wrong Direction? | The Motley Fool

 

[Ronald Zeeman]

I'm retired it was 30 years ago, drove by last week plant expanding see new construction. The plant I worked at closed about ten years ago Hopefully the new plant has an immersion system not the outdated spray system.

 

[Ronald Zeeman]

Twenty years ago quality was real hot. Even got my older son to get a certificate, Calls himself quality manager at his current employer.