• Welcome to Autism Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Aspergers Syndrome, Autism, High Functioning Autism and related conditions.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Private Member only forums for more serious discussions that you may wish to not have guests or search engines access to.
    • Your very own blog. Write about anything you like on your own individual blog.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon! Please also check us out @ https://www.twitter.com/aspiescentral

Studying genocide

  • Author Author Masaniello
  • Create date Create date
  • Blog entry read time Blog entry read time 1 min read
My fellow students from what I can gather, seem to approach the study of genocide as if it is a bad thing. I had a thought: what if I did the required work and wrote the essays from a pro-genocide perspective? It sounds appalling but I wonder if the lecturer has hard to mark any essays from that starting point?

Comments

I don't think genocide is in any way morally defensible, but I can see selfish reasons for engaging in it. However, I doubt they would fit the criteria as a positive for genocide in an academic setting.

I think genocide tends to be fuelled by hate, so it can be personally satisfying to utterly destroy something you despise (no matter how illogical the hate), and it can also permanently get rid of a competitor.
 
It's just a behaviour. It may have positives for some and negatives for others, but in itself it's simply evolved human behaviour crafted by evolution and environmental pressures. Moral judgement is an abstraction of behaviour. It's only right or wrong from a subjective viewpoint. Those whom see it as in their interest will justify it (usually after the fact with emotive language, not as a primary initiator), those who don't will see it as indefensible. It's not new, the only thing new is we are able to kill more in a shorter space of time due to technology - we've been sacking cities since we invented cities.

It often occurs when one group desire or require more resources than another, often adjacent, group has (or are perceived to have). Other species will fight for territory (resources), but usually have evolved less destructive though equally aggressive behaviours.
Our unique ability to make tools that give us far more power over our environment have amplified what used to be manageable into what we call genocide, but we still apply that overt aggression. Like many human behaviours, it's the distortion of old evolved but now unsuitable instincts.
e.g. We used to be able to get angry with another and maybe knock them to the ground or simply dominate them into submission through aggressive displays. Now we do it in cars and end up killing someone because a car is a lethal weapon (or read 'gun' instead of 'car', etc).

Humans are also very good at justifying their behaviour by emotion and biases instead of rationality. Left to our evolved instincts we are very irrational creatures (a very readable book on psychology by Dr Stuart Sutherland called Irrationality that shows how this has been demonstrated - recommend if the subject is of interest - also google the famous Milgram experiments on the psychology of genocide from the 60's, very revealing of human nature in this area).

We live in an over pressured over populated world and have done for some time. So we struggle all the more in competition for the fewer and fewer resources available. A global society predicated on growth will reach a brick wall eventually, and bounce back off it back into itself. We're run out of prey, so prey on ourselves and can now do it in an industrialised fashion.
 

Blog entry information

Author
Masaniello
Read time
1 min read
Views
332
Comments
6
Last update

More entries in University

  • History mark
    I am happy with a distinction I just received in the subject on Mediaeval Europe. Well, who...
  • History essay
    I got 73 percent for my major essay in this subject on the Middle Ages. The lecturer strikes me...
  • The Dark Ages
    My last assignment was to write a piece on the Dark Ages and problems with the term. Historians...
  • Year One
    So, I finished my first year of university a couple of months back. For the most part it's...
  • University
    I've been at UCA (University for the Creative Arts) for a few months now. Really enjoying it so...

More entries from Masaniello

  • Autism and ageing
    This is my third entry on autism and ageing because obviously the subject is dear to my heart...
  • History's lessons not learnt
    The so-called hard right in Europe such as Marine Le Pen, Nigel Farage, and their counterparts...
  • Genocide
    I'm currently studying a unit on massacres and genocide. Cheery stuff but unfortunately, such...
  • Autism and ageing
    Do autistic people age better than neurotypicals? Given we are often neglected, derided, and...
  • Conspiracy theories
    As a student of history, I get the impression that conspiracy theories are based on a touching...

Share this entry

Top Bottom